As printed
A dictionary of violin makers (1896)
Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821.
scan page 65, line 27See the scan
Read the transcript line
This is what the software read off the scan, not the page itself. The cited line is marked, and three lines either side are shown for context.
scan page 65, line 27
- Lignoli, Andrea. A maker in Florence in the 17th century.
- Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821.
- Linarolo (Linerolli), Francesco. The first maker in the family. Worked in Bergamo, later in Venice. A tenor-viol was labelled "Franciscus Linarolus Bergomensis Venetii faciebat." Was probably the maker of an "accordo" dated 1514, beautifully made, the back inlaid with tortoiseshell.
A dictionary of violin makers (n.d.)
Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821.
scan page 67, line 27See the scans: 67, 67source record
Read the transcript line
This is what the software read off the scan, not the page itself. The cited line is marked, and three lines either side are shown for context.
scan page 67, line 27
- Lignoli, Andrea. A maker in Florence in the 17th century.
- Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821.
- Linarolo (Linerolli), Francesco. The first maker in the family. Worked in Bergamo, later in Venice. A tenor-viol was labelled "Franciscus Linarolus Bergomensis Venetii faciebat." Was probably the maker of an "accordo" dated 1514, beautifully made, the back inlaid with tortoiseshell.
Named in 2 books, all printed 1896. Read by software from scans of those pages, not yet checked by a person against the page. Entries from 2 books stand under this name, and the software judged them near-certain the same person. Tell us if that is wrong and we will split the record.
Details and sources
Record note
Not established: that is this record’s honest state, resting on one thing alone — A dictionary of violin makers (1890); A dictionary of violin makers (1890); A dictionary of violin makers (1896), naming this maker and nothing more. Entries from 2 books stand under this name, and the software judged them near-certain the same person. Tell us if that is wrong and we will split the record. No claim beyond what is printed there has been invented here. If more can be said, write in and tell us.
What the books say
- Places and dates of work
- Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821. reported1
- Places and dates of work
- Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821. reported1
- Places and dates of work
- Lilly, James. An English maker, working in 1821. reported1
How the pages were read
3 of the 3 lines here were read from machine text (software that turns a photo of a page into words), not by a person looking at the page image. 1 of them rests on a section heading above a list of names, not on a trade word printed on its own line: “A DICTIONARY OF VIOLIN MAKERS.”.
Notes
- Read from machine text (software that turns a photo of a page into words, or a typed transcription), not by a person looking at the page image. ↩
The books behind this record
This record draws on 2 sources. Each is listed below with how it was read, because a claim read from a photo of the page is stronger than one read from machine text.
- Stainer, C. (Cecie), 1867-1937, A dictionary of violin makers (London: Novello, n.d.). archive.org, dictionaryofviol00stai. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofviol00stai.
scan page 67, line 27
- Stainer, C. (Cecie), 1867-1937, A dictionary of violin makers (London: Novello, n.d.). archive.org, dictionaryofviol1899stai. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofviol1899stai.
scan page 67, line 27
- Stainer, C. (Cecie), 1867-1937, A dictionary of violin makers (London ; New York: Novello, Ewer, 1896). archive.org, dictionaryofviol00stai_0. https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofviol00stai_0.
scan page 65, line 27