Bow & Bridge Violin and bow makers, as the old books printed them

Scan 202

The violin, its famous makers and their imitators, 1887

10 lines. Read by computer on 28 September 2026. No printed page number was found. See the scan on archive.org.

1and his contemporary makers were intuitive. Their rules, having their origin in experience, were applied as dictated by their marvellous sense of touch and cunning, with results infinitely superior to any obtained with the aid of the most approved mechanical contrivances. When to these considerations we add that devotedness of purpose, without which nothing really great in art has been accomplished, we have a catalogue of excellences sufficient to account for the greatness of their achievements.
3Turning again to the manuscript of Arisi, we find that "On the 12th of May, 1701, Don Antonio Cavezudo, leader of the private orchestra of King Charles II. of Spain, wrote a highly complimentary letter to Stradivari from Madrid, assuring him that though he had received bow instruments from several makers, for different courts, yet he had never been able to obtain them of such a refined and beautiful tone as those made by him." Arisi adds that Don Antonio Cavezudo was also in the service of the Duke of Anjou.
5M. Fétis, in his notice of Stradivari,1 remarks: "The life of Antonio Stradivari was as tranquil as his calling was peaceful. The year 1702, alone, must have caused him much disquiet, when, during the war concerning the succession, the city of Cremona was taken by Marshall Villeroy, retaken by Prince Eugene, and finally taken a third time by the French; but after that period Italy enjoyed a long tranquillity, in which the old age of the artist glided peacefully away."
7A campaign had taken place in Italy in 1701, when Prince Eugene, with thirty thousand troops, out-generalled
91 "Notice of Anthony Stradivari," by F. J. Fétis, translated by John Bishop. 1864.

The computer misreads some letters and numbers. Where a name matters to you, read the scan.